Saturday, November 28, 2009

My essay needs revision but its done

What am I sick with again?
Every year the flu season marks the beginning of a time where our country goes into pandemonium. Everyone prepares themselves as well as possible for the flu by getting vaccines, washing their hands, and by completely exiling those that have already been infected. However, this year there was a slight difference with people’s perception of what they should do in preparation of the coming flu season. Panic was struck into people causing many to take some normal precautions as well as some extravagant ones. What were some of these precautions that were not typical to prior flu seasons one might ask? Some people speculated that by not purchasing pork products, not consuming pork products, and by eliminating all contact with pork that that possibility of becoming ill would decrease. Now a person might ask “How would eliminating pork products from daily life have anything to do with reducing the chance of catching the flu?” but, if you weren’t aware of it, there was a recent “swine flu” outbreak eight months ago which has caused all of this pandemonium. The thing that people didn’t realize however is that in reality there was no swine flu outburst and instead it was a H1N1 pandemic. So how exactly did this “swine flu pandemic” arise when in truth it was only a H1N1 outburst?
Sometime in April the original “swine flu” outbreak began to emerge somewhere in Mexico with the sudden illness and death of many people. Scientist began to uncover the cause of this and found that those infected and those that have died had strains of the flu called H1N1 that of which is very similar to strains of flu found in the swine flu. With that handful of information the media took its own approach on the story which was to broadcast to the entire world that there has been a swine flu outbreak. During this time every time you visited CNN, The New York Times, or MSNBC, all you would see is “Shutdown of schools caused by the swine flu or swine flu still more to come”. Everywhere you looked you would see the words SWINE FLU in black bold print. With this sudden spike in cases of the so called “swine flu” many people began to become weary of purchasing pork products or even eating anything pork related. This entire situation was not helped with the perpetuation of swine flu fear by many other websites and blogs which discussed how people should stay away from pork. There were some articles that were published by smaller news stories that did not even mention H1N1 and instead only mentioned the swine flu pandemic. Headlines like” U.S. Swine Flu Deaths Now Estimated At 4K” and “President Barack Obama Declares Swine Flu A U.S. National Emergency” only increased fear and forwarded the idea that there was really a swine flu pandemic. However, as time progressed there was an almost immediate change from headlines including swine flu to H1N1.
Changing from a swine flu to a H1N1 outbreak was a movement that was started under the pork industries. With the sudden decrease in pork sales the industry was feeling a real large hit to its sales. The industry already knew that the so called swine flu pandemic was really a H1N1 pandemic which is something only similar to the swine flu (the H1N1 is a strain which can be found in the swine flu but IS NOT THE SAME). With that the industry pushed scientist to reemphasize the fact that it is a H1N1 pandemic and not a swine flu pandemic. The pork industry could no longer sustain forcing the media to make a change. By this time you could see that press sphere was making a turn and going back to the original sources of information. This 180 turn was then accepted by the large media companies which in turn was then relayed to the readers.
With the almost sudden change of names of swine flu to H1N1 influenza there came much confusion of what was occurring. Many people began to wonder whether there were two pandemics going on at once. With two different virus names being discussed in the media, a simple misconception was a result that should have been obvious. Before this change many articles stated that the H1N1 strain was of the same family from swine flu. Media sources makes many correlation of the swine flu with H1N1 as seen in the proceeding example “More than 2,700 other patients worldwide are believed to be suffering from the virus that government officials call by its technical name, 2009 H1N1.” Even though there were many obvious statements that the technical name of the swine flu was in fact H1N1, many still did not see the correlation between the two. To clarify this CNN and other larger media sources responded with articles that blatantly told the difference between H1N1 and swine flu. Now the next big headlines that were published included “Stop Calling It Swine Flu!” and “U.S. officials want 'swine' out of flu name”
Once all of this was said and done everything went back to normal. News media sources simply continued to propagate the H1N1 scare keeping the pandemonium alive and strong. As we can see many news media sources took their own approach towards this entire H1N1 situation. Instead of forwarding the correct things, many articles got warped into talking about swine flu instead of the H1N1. Since the larger sources said that this was a swine flu pandemic, much of the smaller sites simply forwarded their articles from these larger sources which further increased the use of the term swine flu.
The entire time this situation was occurred my outlook of what was happening was somewhat biased against the news websites. To me it seemed like there was a major up play on the entire issue and still is being up played. Up until Nov 12 (for the year 2009 only) CNN reports that there has only been 3900 deaths caused or related to H1N1. Now even though 3900 people are a lot of people in reality it isn’t as severe as compared to the regular flu. WrongDiagnosis states that the US has roughly 20,000 deaths that are caused and related to the flu. Even though the H1N1 has only been around for eight months, there has been an average of 500 deaths per months due to the H1N1. If you compared the H1N1 500 deaths to an average of 1600 deaths due to the common flu, you can see that the H1N1 is so much more miniscule. The flu accounts for three times the amount of deaths compared to the H1N1 (this correlation shows us that we should be much more worried about the common cold), but what does the news propagate into our media the most? That’s right; the H1N1 has a larger story compared to the flu which in turn makes many people forget about the common flu. Much of this has to deal with how much attention the media can get from the people. Who wants to hear about the common cold when you can hear about how the H1N1 has claimed four thousand? Or even better, what headline sounds better “Out Break of the Swine Flu Erupts in Mexico” of “Out Break of the H1N1 Erupts in Mexico”. Obviously people are going to want to hear about the swine flu just because they know what swine flu means and not H1N1.
It’s still funny to see how the news media will spin its words in order to create hype over a certain story. Headlines from MSNBC and The Washington Post like “Swine flu may have hit peak, but not over yet” and “Swine flu cases fall in U.S. but may rise with holiday travel” simply does not make any sense to me. How is it possible that the U.S. has seen the peak of this pandemic but there is more to come after holiday travels? I thought the peak of something is the highest point was it not? And why do they want to offer the public a chance of hope but seem to take it away so fast. The second headline seems to be saying to me “Everything seems to be getting better and it seems like you’re going to live but you might die still”. Why not just say that there could be an increase in the number of cases after travels. Again much of this seems like it goes back to “let’s see how much hype we can get out of this story” and “how much can we scare the public with this pandemic so that they keep reading about the latest news”. Well I say ignore it all. Don’t give into all of the media’s propaganda instead stay informed about the situation and dig deeper into story. I’m not saying that the media itself is wrong but instead that they are obviously out to make a buck by putting the best spin into their stories. Not only can you see this outlook through the H1N1 story but you can see this ideal in many others (the fall in housing prices, automobile companies declining, and many others). If you simply follow a story for long enough you can sometimes see that the media wants us to fear so we keep coming back to them to read the next chapter of the story. So next time you’re reading a news article, read deeper and further so you don’t immediately fall into the mindset that the news media wants you to be in.

http://pagingdrgupta.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/11/stop-calling-it-swine-flu/
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/04/24/swine.flu/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/04/29/swine.flu/index.html
http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/f/flu/deaths.htm
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34066494/ns/health-cold_and_flu/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/20/AR2009112001820.html?wprss=rss_nation

2 comments:

  1. This is well written and fluid. I feel like you really wrote out the life story of the 'swine/h1n1 flu'. You wrote in a way that the reader was incorporated the entire time and could relate what you said to the things they have seen through living. You reached out to what the news wrote in headlines and said. Although brining in this sources could be stronger if you are looking to revise any. If you have got any specific questions let me know.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry I'm late with this! I thought this was due on Sunday and then yesterday Blogger wasn't working. Well, here it goes!

    I think you need to say that you're analyzing not the flu, but people's perceptions of it. I know you said you like jumping into the topic, but I think the reader could follow you better if you mentioned the topic at the beginning. It doesn't have to be dramatic, even a short sentence would be just fine.

    I like how you recreate the feelings people had during these events. I also liked how you made time progress thoughout the essay. It makes me want to keep reading! I enjoyed reading you essay!

    ReplyDelete